[ Home | Staff & Contacts | HiFi Playground | Listening tests | DIY & Tweakings | Music & Books ]
Product: Marantz CD 38
CD player
Manufacturer: Marantz
- Japan
Approx. price: 300 $
The Marantz CD 38 is
the cheapest player made by Marantz, a Japan-based Company which has
become very popular for the excellent quality/price ratio of its
digital CD players.
This CD 38, though it is the cheapest of the
family, still offers the usual functions, even the most useless ones
and everything can be controlled via remote.
The output level is
adjustable though I don't recommend this feature for connecting ANY
CD player (especially if cheap) directly to a power amplifier since
the quality of the potentiometer is generally very low. Hence the
advice is: keep the output level set to the max value.
The cabinet
of the CD 38 is very light and weak, prone to resonate, indeed.
Inside, it makes use of a Continuos Calibration digital system, as
explained clearly by the writing on the front panel. Obviously no
digital output is available (though some competitors, in the same
price range, offer even a coax output) and the mains cable is of the
non-detachable type.
Knowing pretty well the sound of many other
Maratz CD players I was very curious to put the baby of the family
under test. I've matched it with same price tag partners into my
budget system and I've even used it, for a while, into my reference
system.
Let's put this
straight: the CD 38 doesn't sound like, nor even it comes close to,
its bigger brothers CD 57 and 67.
The sound of the CD 38 is a bit
dry and shut-in, with an audible roll-off in the highs which aren't
exactly sweet: sometimes the sound is edgy and harsh. And so is the
mid range: very dry and sometimes grainy, exactly like many other
entry-level CD players.
The mid-bass is quite good instead,
articulated and clean, able to reproduce full-bodied male
voices and electric upper-bass lines.
The bass range is powerful,
not very extended but quite controlled. For example, the deeper notes
of the double-bass lack some energy and the musical instrument is
reproduced as it was smaller than its real (big) size.
Well,
there's no doubt it is a cheap CD player but its sound offers some
interesting aspect (the mid-bass and the bass) that suggests this
player can become a far better component with some easy, minor
changes, as we'll see later on.
The CD 38 sounds compressed as it can't extract all the energy from the discs. This is confirmed by a sound that tends to be lazy and slow, quite unable to follow the natural pace of Music. The micro-dynamics performance is good instead and the CD 38 begins to sing only when the musical program is of the easy kind: few acoustical instruments, few voices etc. For example it feels at home with jazz trios or small ensembles of ancient Music.
As stated in other
reviews, cheap CD players are normally unable to create a decent
soundstage. If you still think that all CD players sound the same try
a blind test with the CD 38 against the CD 67 and you'll understand
what kind of difference a better player can make in terms of overall
musicality and...soundstaging.
Yeah, I know that a digital
sequence of numbers is always a digital sequence of numbers
but...please keep in mind that a better transport can extract more
infos with less errors (hence, with less error correction and
interpolation).
Plus, a key role in performance is played by the
analog output stage, which treats an analog-only signal: the better
the circuits and components, the better the overall sound.
Actually
the output stages of cheap CD players are...er, CHEAP and poor
sounding.
Hence the soundstage (we were talking about this,
right?) is narrow and very, very LOW. There's no air among the
instruments and the image, quite decently focused, is right there, in
the middle, between the loudspeakers.
Just replacing the
stock feet with the Vibrapod
Isolators or equivalent improves the sound unbelievably. The
sound becomes richer, airy and well extended, so that the dullness
almost disappears.
If you're listening to the CD 38 with its stock
feet you're losing the 40 % of its performance, in my opinion.
Clearly, the vibrations of the weak and light cabinet had some side
effect on the transport and on the DAC & output stages.
Another step forward
in sound quality can be attained changing the stock interconnect
cables with a Monster Cable Interlink 300 or Interlink CD, something
very cheap but audibly better than the stock one. You can even try to
use something better, like the Monster
Interlink 400 mkII but I'd suggest to stop there and save the
extra money.
Of course you can use any cable, even very expen$ive
ones, but it would produce no audible result since, at some point,
the limit to performance is not the cable itself BUT the CD player.
I
suspect that a better mains cable could add something to the sound of
the CD 38. There's no need to spend an arm and a leg, into our Tweaks
Section you'll find several DIY projects for building your own AC
special cable (from the easier to the more esoteric ones).
Finally
an heavy book on the top of the player can improve, slightly, the
soundstaging capabilities of this player.
Don't think that with
these simple tweaks the CD 38 will sound like a far expen$ive CD
player, as I always say, there's no such a thing as a free lunch :-)
From a well known brand like Marantz, renowned for the good sound of its CD players and for the attention to the details I'd have expected a better mechanical construction: four softer feet and a sheet of non-resonant compound at the bottom of this player would have placed the CD 38 among the best of its price range, even considering that there are cheaper players that sound more or less like the Marantz...
The Marantz CD 38 is a cheap entry-level CD player which, with few easy and costless mods, can become a far better performer. Right out of its box it's an average player with a good mid-bass and bass range.
© Copyright 1999 Lucio Cadeddu
How to print this article
[ Home | Staff & Contacts | HiFi Playground | Listening tests | DIY & Tweakings | Music & Books ]